Welcome to Python 3¶
On Christmas Day 1999 I sat down to write my first piece of software in Python. My experience seems to be typical for Python users. I was initially surprised that indentation was significant, it felt scary to not define variables and I was hesitant to use a dynamic language to make serious software. However, in no time at all these worries were gone and I noticed I wrote code faster than ever. 18 months later a friend hired me to his start-up to help him write a content management system and I ended up in the enviable position of being a full time Python developer. I don’t even mention other languages on my CV anymore, because I don’t want to use them. I’ve become a full fledged, fanatic, Pythonista.
I got interested in Python 3 at EuroPython 2007 in lovely Vilnius. Guido van Rossums keynote was about the upcoming changes in Python 3 and although he emphatically said that you could not run the same code under Python 2 and Python 3, I couldn’t see many reasons why it couldn’t be done, considering the forward compatibility that was planned for Python 2.6. So I started looking at the differences between Python 2 and Python 3 and tried to find out how to write code that would run under both versions and learned a whole lot about Python on the way.
Most surprising was how little the fundamentals have changed. Writing code with Python 3 still feels just like the old comfortable shoes, but newly shined and with new laces. The hardest change to get used to is to remember that print is a function. The relatively small differences doesn’t necessarily mean that porting to Python 3 is easy, but it can be and hopefully this book will make it even easier.
Is it time yet?¶
Yes, Python 3 is a nicer language to work with. But Python 2 is also very good and the major reason for not porting yet is that Python 2 is so good that most developers feel little incentive to switch. Although it has been officially declared that Python 2.7 will be the last version of Python 2, it will receive bug-fixes for many years to come, so there is no hurry to change to Python 3 for that reason.
So when should you port? In general, I would recommend everyone to move to Python 3 as soon as you can. If the applications and modules you write are for your or your company’s use only, then look into porting when it feels like you have the time. If your project is in a state of panic, moving to Python 3 is probably not the right thing to do.
If you are writing software that you sell or share as open source, then you want to move more quickly to enable your customers to move over to Python 3.
If you are writing a package that other developers use, every day it doesn’t support Python 3 is a day when you are blocking your users from porting, and a day when Python 3 users have to look for another package than yours. In this case you should really try to port immediately, and if you have dependencies that is not ported, then help port them first.
What if I can’t port right now?¶
In any case all the packages you depend on need to be ported before you can port. Most packages that have been ported to Python 3 are listed on the CheeseShop under the “Python 3 packages” heading. That list is a list of all packages that includes "Programming Language :: Python :: 3" as a trove classifier in the package meta data. If your dependencies have not been ported it is a good idea to contact the maintainers of your dependencies to see what plans they have for porting. Perhaps they do already support Python 3, but didn’t update their meta data? Maybe they just didn’t know anyone was waiting for a Python 3 port? Maybe you can help porting?
It’s always a good idea to publish information on your plans for porting on your software’s homepage or in the description of the package on the CheeseShop. Include a list of your dependencies that aren’t ported. That way your users can see if there is something they can help with. Open source all is about programmers helping each other; both using and contributing to each others software. A porting effort is no different.
And even if you aren’t porting right now, there are things you can do already. Chapter 3, Preparing for Python 3 lists things you should change before porting, and Chapter 6 Improving your code with modern idioms lists modern idioms in Python that you already can use, depending on what Python versions you need to support. To ease porting, many of the new functions and modules in Python 3 has been backported to Python 2.6 or Python 2.7, and the only thing that stops you from using this already is if you need to support older versions.
Python and its versions¶
Since I started writing this book, Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 has been released. For the purposes of this book, Python 2.6 and Python 2.7 can be seen as equal. So most of the times the book says Python 2.6, you can read that as Python 2.6 or Python 2.7.
Python 3.1 was released quite quickly after Python 3.0 and before any significant adoption of Python 3. Therefore it was decided to drop support for Python 3.0. As most platforms that support Python 3 already use Python 3.1 for that support it is unlikely that you ever need to care about Python 3.0. When running your tests under Python 3 you only have to run it with Python 3.1 and Python 3.2, and you can safely ignore Python 3.0. So when this book says Python 3, you can read that as Python 3.1 and later.
There is still very little documentation on how to port to Python 3. There is a short how-to in the Python 3.2 documentation at http://docs.python.org/dev/howto/pyporting.html. There is also page on the official Python wiki for porting notes at http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingPythonToPy3k but it is still fairly empty.
If you need help, or if you want to help out, there is the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list. You can subscribe to it from http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-porting.